<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Orbs of Rwahle, Pg 7A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twilightlady.com/2008/09/26/the-orbs-of-rwahle-pg-7a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twilightlady.com/2008/09/26/the-orbs-of-rwahle-pg-7a/</link>
	<description>Webcomic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 02:22:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blakechen</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlady.com/2008/09/26/the-orbs-of-rwahle-pg-7a/comment-page-1/#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>blakechen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlady.com/2008/09/26/the-orbs-of-rwahle-pg-7a/#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>While we&#039;re on the subject of that saying, here&#039;s an interesting fact:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.samueljohnson.com/road.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.samueljohnson.com/road.html&lt;/a&gt;

1775. That&#039;s 233 years ago. And I had written that the MC first heard the saying &quot;nearly 250 years ago&quot; &lt;i&gt;before&lt;/i&gt; I came across this.

Of course, no one &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; knows where the saying originated from, and in truth it probably dates back much further. I just thought it was a neat coincidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we&#8217;re on the subject of that saying, here&#8217;s an interesting fact:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.samueljohnson.com/road.html" target="blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.samueljohnson.com/road.html</a></p>
<p>1775. That&#8217;s 233 years ago. And I had written that the MC first heard the saying &#8220;nearly 250 years ago&#8221; <i>before</i> I came across this.</p>
<p>Of course, no one <i>really</i> knows where the saying originated from, and in truth it probably dates back much further. I just thought it was a neat coincidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MidnightMonarch</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlady.com/2008/09/26/the-orbs-of-rwahle-pg-7a/comment-page-1/#comment-2280</link>
		<dc:creator>MidnightMonarch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlady.com/2008/09/26/the-orbs-of-rwahle-pg-7a/#comment-2280</guid>
		<description>i agree with teardropcatcher. :/ Everything needs to be analyzed in that sort of situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with teardropcatcher. :/ Everything needs to be analyzed in that sort of situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teardropcatcher</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlady.com/2008/09/26/the-orbs-of-rwahle-pg-7a/comment-page-1/#comment-2277</link>
		<dc:creator>Teardropcatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlady.com/2008/09/26/the-orbs-of-rwahle-pg-7a/#comment-2277</guid>
		<description>Oh, really? So if you murder someone in self-defense, your intentions don&#039;t matter at all? =\ I think both result and intention should be considered very carefully before qualifying an action. And to qualify a person as good or bad... well, you need to be God or a high school student.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, really? So if you murder someone in self-defense, your intentions don&#8217;t matter at all? =\ I think both result and intention should be considered very carefully before qualifying an action. And to qualify a person as good or bad&#8230; well, you need to be God or a high school student.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azure</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlady.com/2008/09/26/the-orbs-of-rwahle-pg-7a/comment-page-1/#comment-2274</link>
		<dc:creator>Azure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlady.com/2008/09/26/the-orbs-of-rwahle-pg-7a/#comment-2274</guid>
		<description>No, the saying means that &quot;I only had the best intentions&quot; has historically been used to justify the most horrific of atrocities. You can&#039;t judge people on intentions. You can only judge results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the saying means that &#8220;I only had the best intentions&#8221; has historically been used to justify the most horrific of atrocities. You can&#8217;t judge people on intentions. You can only judge results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marut</title>
		<link>http://www.twilightlady.com/2008/09/26/the-orbs-of-rwahle-pg-7a/comment-page-1/#comment-2272</link>
		<dc:creator>Marut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twilightlady.com/2008/09/26/the-orbs-of-rwahle-pg-7a/#comment-2272</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always hated that saying, actually.
One person intends to destroy everyone and everything he meets in the most horrific manner possible, but accidentally ends up aiding them.
Another person intends to help all those he comes across, only to bring them harm.
Which is a better person?
I think intentions are far more important than results, but that&#039;s just me, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always hated that saying, actually.<br />
One person intends to destroy everyone and everything he meets in the most horrific manner possible, but accidentally ends up aiding them.<br />
Another person intends to help all those he comes across, only to bring them harm.<br />
Which is a better person?<br />
I think intentions are far more important than results, but that&#8217;s just me, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
